DAMAGING: Pastor Impregnates Senior Pastor’s Daughter And Absconds
A 29-year-old pastor (name withheld) standing trial for allegedly molesting and impregnating his senior pastor’s daughter in Ikere-Ekiti, Ekiti State, has run away to establish his own church.
It was gathered that the pastor whose case had just been transferred from the Ekiti State Magistrate Court to the state High Court was granted bail in July after being remanded in detention for about three months due to his inability to meet his initial bail conditions.
The new church, which he started in Ikoyi area of Ikere-Ekiti was said to attract a lot of people, having succeeded in taking away many members of the church where he pulled out.
The girl, Oluwadamilola who until her ordeal was an SS1 student of a high school in Ikere-Ekiti, gave birth to a baby boy on May 26, while the man was still in detention, over the matter.
Damilola’s mother said the father of the young pastor had entered a written agreement with the parents of the girl in March this year, promising that they would take care of the girl and her pregnancy but the alleged lackadaisical attitude of the pastor thereafter compelled the girl’s parents to report the case to the police.
According to sources, the embattled pastor had been organizing revival programmes and crusade, calling members of the public who were not aware of his atrocities to come for miracles.
It was gathered that the middle-aged pastor was married, and this was the reason he hurriedly left the church in September last year when he realized the girl was pregnant and warned her not to let anybody know.
Revenge? Nigeria Plans To Impose £5,000 Visa Bond On British Citizens
Apparently very insulted by the British government’s decision to impose a £3,000 visa bond on Nigerian immigrants, the Federal Government has put plans in place to place a similar bond on incoming British citizens.
The Osun Defender reports that this is in retaliation to the new but controversial immigration policy of the UK scheduled to commence in November 2013.
The Home Office of the United Kingdom, recently classified Nigeria, India, as “high risk” and placed a £3,000 bond on every Nigerian visiting Britain. The bond will be forfeited to the British government if an immigrant overstays his permit. More than two million Nigerians are residing in the UK.
Uproar had greeted the immigration policy described as “discriminatory” since its announcement in June. Nigeria is one of the countries put on the British “high-risk-list”. Others are India, Ghana,Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The countries are slated for the pilot scheme ofthe new immigration policy to check immigration abuses.
A reliable source at the Nigerian High Commission in London told National Mirror thatthe refusal of the British Government to backpedal on the visa bond compelled Nigeria to fight back. The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Olugbenga Ashiru, had earlier assured that Nigeria would react appropriately if the policy was eventually implemented.
The source, who is a senior officer of the High Commission but did not want his name mentioned, told our correspondent in London that Nigeria had officially protested to the British government over the policy. He, however, said that there was no sign that the British would rescind the decision.
“As a responsible country, we have protested officially against the discriminatory policy to the British government. But from all indications there is no going back on the policy. We have tried to make them see reasons on the need to review the new immigration policy, but it is like a done deal.
“Don’t forget that Nigeria has threatened to retaliate if the policy is implemented. So, we are only waiting for the implementation and the modalities of the new British immigration policy. But I can assure you that the Nigerian government won’t fold its hands. We would even raise the stake beyond the £3,000 they are asking Nigerians to pay as bond. We are looking at £5,000 as visa bond for UK citizens visiting Nigeria. This is our plan, which is subject to the approval of the Federal Government,” the source told National Mirror yesterday.
This stand is bound to strain the diplomatic relations between Britain and its former colony,Nigeria. Early this year, British Prime Minister David Cameron chided Nigeria for passing anti-gay bill and threatened to cut aid to the country. Also, Cameron recently berated Nigerian leaders for the mismanagement of the country’s huge natural resources.
But the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ spokesman, Ogbole Amedu Odeh, denied knowledge of the £5,000 visa bond. “I’m just hearing that from you. I’m not aware of any £5,000 visa bond for British citizens,” Odeh told National Mirror on phone yesterday.
“Nigeria has not got official correspondence from the British government. Anytime Nigeria gets official communication on the policy, we will react appropriately.”
Meanwhile, Nigerians in the UK under the umbrella of the Central Association of Nigerians in the United Kingdom, CANUK, have said that if this bond is implemented, wrong people will be targeted.
In an interview with National Mirror in London, CANUK Chairman, Bimbo Folayan, said: “On the visa bond, we’ve expressed our feelings that this is not a right policy. We feel that the wrong people are being targeted. We believe that this will be counter-productive and we think this is more political, more economical than immigration related.
“We have protested to the Commonwealth Office, they have listened to us and they promised to get back to us.
“Because of the present situation of British economy, it is probably another way for the Home Office to make money. But that will be to the detriment of genuine travellers. The £3,000 bond will only swell the purse of the British government.”
They, however, opposed the planned retaliation of the British immigration policy by the Federal Government of Nigeria.
Folayan added: “Our position is that two wrongs cannot make a right. I believe that Nigerian government should not retaliate wrongly. Three times this year, I have gone to Nigeria with British investors. So, it means if I’m going to Nigeria, I will have to look for £5,000 visa bond for each of the visitors.
“So, this can only hurt Nigeria. This can hurt investment inflow in Nigeria. We do not support the £5,000 proposed visa bond. Either way, from the British government or Nigerian government, we do not support the policy.
“Policies are made and can be changed. If this is injurious to the economy of the UK, they have to change the policy. I don’t see anything cast in stone on the matter.”
The group, however, said that there was no basis for Nigerians to come to UK illegally.
“The region of the world that is enjoying growth is Africa and that is where the focus is. In UK, we are not recording so much growth and the economic forecast is not too promising.
“So, everybody is feeling the pain. There are not many jobs in the UK any more. There is actually no basis for any youth to leave Nigeria and live in UK illegally because, one, there are no jobs. Two, if you come illegally, that is even worse because you cannot get a job without relevant papers like work permit whereas there are opportunities in Nigeria,” Folayan said.
Nigerians also decried their being labelled as “high risks”. “Nigeria is not high risk. The vast majority of Nigerians living in UK are students, workers and those born in the country. That is not to say that there are no illegal immigrants.
“We strongly feel that Nigeria is not a high risk country regardless of the statistics they might have gathered. We object to targeting a few countries, calling them ‘high risk’.
“We do not support illegal immigrants. We actually encourage Nigerians in the UK to regularise their papers. We’re also in the forefront of encouraging Nigerians living in UK illegally to embrace the opportunity that have been provided by the International Organisation of Migration, IOM, for them to go back home and live more meaningfully than staying in UK without getting a job because of lack of regular papers.”
The group noted that the £3,000 bond would only embolden desperate people rather than serve as deterrent.
The Osun Defender reports that this is in retaliation to the new but controversial immigration policy of the UK scheduled to commence in November 2013.
The Home Office of the United Kingdom, recently classified Nigeria, India, as “high risk” and placed a £3,000 bond on every Nigerian visiting Britain. The bond will be forfeited to the British government if an immigrant overstays his permit. More than two million Nigerians are residing in the UK.
Uproar had greeted the immigration policy described as “discriminatory” since its announcement in June. Nigeria is one of the countries put on the British “high-risk-list”. Others are India, Ghana,Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The countries are slated for the pilot scheme ofthe new immigration policy to check immigration abuses.
A reliable source at the Nigerian High Commission in London told National Mirror thatthe refusal of the British Government to backpedal on the visa bond compelled Nigeria to fight back. The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Olugbenga Ashiru, had earlier assured that Nigeria would react appropriately if the policy was eventually implemented.
The source, who is a senior officer of the High Commission but did not want his name mentioned, told our correspondent in London that Nigeria had officially protested to the British government over the policy. He, however, said that there was no sign that the British would rescind the decision.
“As a responsible country, we have protested officially against the discriminatory policy to the British government. But from all indications there is no going back on the policy. We have tried to make them see reasons on the need to review the new immigration policy, but it is like a done deal.
“Don’t forget that Nigeria has threatened to retaliate if the policy is implemented. So, we are only waiting for the implementation and the modalities of the new British immigration policy. But I can assure you that the Nigerian government won’t fold its hands. We would even raise the stake beyond the £3,000 they are asking Nigerians to pay as bond. We are looking at £5,000 as visa bond for UK citizens visiting Nigeria. This is our plan, which is subject to the approval of the Federal Government,” the source told National Mirror yesterday.
This stand is bound to strain the diplomatic relations between Britain and its former colony,Nigeria. Early this year, British Prime Minister David Cameron chided Nigeria for passing anti-gay bill and threatened to cut aid to the country. Also, Cameron recently berated Nigerian leaders for the mismanagement of the country’s huge natural resources.
But the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ spokesman, Ogbole Amedu Odeh, denied knowledge of the £5,000 visa bond. “I’m just hearing that from you. I’m not aware of any £5,000 visa bond for British citizens,” Odeh told National Mirror on phone yesterday.
“Nigeria has not got official correspondence from the British government. Anytime Nigeria gets official communication on the policy, we will react appropriately.”
Meanwhile, Nigerians in the UK under the umbrella of the Central Association of Nigerians in the United Kingdom, CANUK, have said that if this bond is implemented, wrong people will be targeted.
In an interview with National Mirror in London, CANUK Chairman, Bimbo Folayan, said: “On the visa bond, we’ve expressed our feelings that this is not a right policy. We feel that the wrong people are being targeted. We believe that this will be counter-productive and we think this is more political, more economical than immigration related.
“We have protested to the Commonwealth Office, they have listened to us and they promised to get back to us.
“Because of the present situation of British economy, it is probably another way for the Home Office to make money. But that will be to the detriment of genuine travellers. The £3,000 bond will only swell the purse of the British government.”
They, however, opposed the planned retaliation of the British immigration policy by the Federal Government of Nigeria.
Folayan added: “Our position is that two wrongs cannot make a right. I believe that Nigerian government should not retaliate wrongly. Three times this year, I have gone to Nigeria with British investors. So, it means if I’m going to Nigeria, I will have to look for £5,000 visa bond for each of the visitors.
“So, this can only hurt Nigeria. This can hurt investment inflow in Nigeria. We do not support the £5,000 proposed visa bond. Either way, from the British government or Nigerian government, we do not support the policy.
“Policies are made and can be changed. If this is injurious to the economy of the UK, they have to change the policy. I don’t see anything cast in stone on the matter.”
The group, however, said that there was no basis for Nigerians to come to UK illegally.
“The region of the world that is enjoying growth is Africa and that is where the focus is. In UK, we are not recording so much growth and the economic forecast is not too promising.
“So, everybody is feeling the pain. There are not many jobs in the UK any more. There is actually no basis for any youth to leave Nigeria and live in UK illegally because, one, there are no jobs. Two, if you come illegally, that is even worse because you cannot get a job without relevant papers like work permit whereas there are opportunities in Nigeria,” Folayan said.
Nigerians also decried their being labelled as “high risks”. “Nigeria is not high risk. The vast majority of Nigerians living in UK are students, workers and those born in the country. That is not to say that there are no illegal immigrants.
“We strongly feel that Nigeria is not a high risk country regardless of the statistics they might have gathered. We object to targeting a few countries, calling them ‘high risk’.
“We do not support illegal immigrants. We actually encourage Nigerians in the UK to regularise their papers. We’re also in the forefront of encouraging Nigerians living in UK illegally to embrace the opportunity that have been provided by the International Organisation of Migration, IOM, for them to go back home and live more meaningfully than staying in UK without getting a job because of lack of regular papers.”
The group noted that the £3,000 bond would only embolden desperate people rather than serve as deterrent.
Tani Omotayo – “I’m Not Living With Wizkid Until We’re Married"
While some girls would jump at the chance to sleep in the same bed with Ayo ‘Wizkid’ Balogun, the pop star’s girlfriend Tani Omotayo seems not to be in a hurry to jump in.
When asked by a fan on Twitter if she lived with Wizzy, she replied “live together ke? When he has not married me. Not at all”
While many see this as a woman showing her self-respect and worth, others may see this as a ploy to tension Wizkid into proposing.
Tani, who recently took over Designer’s Club, also recently welcomed celebrity guest to her new store in the person of MMMG’s Emma Nyra.
When asked by a fan on Twitter if she lived with Wizzy, she replied “live together ke? When he has not married me. Not at all”
While many see this as a woman showing her self-respect and worth, others may see this as a ploy to tension Wizkid into proposing.
Tani, who recently took over Designer’s Club, also recently welcomed celebrity guest to her new store in the person of MMMG’s Emma Nyra.
SHARP GUY! We Got Photos Of John Dumelo's Busty Girlfriend
Confirmer, John Dumelo is a guy with taste and teeth and class and everything, see the heavy duty cargo he reserved for himself, after tittering Yvonne Nelson then calling her friend and sister (na thesame paper born una?)
Badt guy.
Badt guy.
PHOTOS: Woman Pregnant For 46 Years Gives Birth To Mummy-Like Baby

In 1955 in a small village just outside Casablanca, 26 year old Zahra Aboutalib is pregnant with her first child. She was looking forward to giving birth, but after 48 hours of painful labour, she was rushed to the local hospital. Doctors informed her that she would need a caesarean section. On the ward Zahra saw a woman in terrible pain die in child-birth. She fled the hospital fearing she would meet the same fate if she remained.
In the days that followed, Zahra continued to suffer excruciating labour pains but the baby remained resolutely in her womb. After a few more days the pains ceased and the baby stopped moving.

In Moroccan culture, it is believed that a baby can sleep inside the mother to protect her honour. Zahra believed this myth and put the pregnancy out of her mind. She adopted three children and in due course they made her a grandmother.
Zahra Aboutalib, Many years later when Zahra was 75 years old, the pains suddenly returned. Her son being concerned for his mother’s well-being wanted her to see a specialist. For this they had to travel to Rabat where they saw Professor Taibi Ouazzani. He suspected the protruding belly was being caused by an ovarian tumour and arranged for her to have an ultra-sound scan. This revealed a large mass that he could not identify.
He referred Zahra to a specialist radiographer for a second opinion. He could see it was a calcified structure of some sort, but it took a detailed MRI scan to reveal that it was the baby Zahra had conceived 46 years earlier.
INHUMANE: Parents Arrested For Burning 4-Year-Old Son With Boling Water
The parents of a 4-year-old boy from Arizona, USA, will face abuse charges for child abuse. According to the local police, the mother scolded her son with boiling water and then intentionally kept him away from getting medical attention for about two weeks.
The mother, Mrs. Joscilin Smith, 28, allegedly threw a pot of boiling water at the boy’s father, Mr. Aaron Roland, during an argument. Some of the water splashed on the boy.
Medical documents say the boy suffered severe burns on his back, arm, shoulder and leg. They have been classified as the second-degree burns to 8 per cent of his body.
According to the local newsmen, the couple, who have seven children between ages one and 10, told police they didn’t take the child to the hospital because they were afraid they would be suspected of child abuse and lose their kids.
Mrs. Joscilin Smith has been charged with aggravated assault and three counts of child abuse, while Mr. Aaron Roland has been charged with a single count of child abuse.
According to police, the victim’s siblings reported a history of verbal and physical abuse.
The injured toddler’s maternal grandmother told police that she was on the phone with Mrs. Smith on July 27 when the bad parent of seven hurled a pot of boiling water at her husband during a fight.
Mr. Roland immediately applied some medical treatment for burns to his back and buttock, but the couple allegedly decided not to take their son to a hospital.
On August 9, 2013, Friday, police officers responded to the couple’s home in the 7300 block of East Naranja Avenue after getting a request for a welfare check from Child Protective Services.
Sammie-Jo Olson, who lives across the street from Smith and Roland, said that she had heard about the incident and called CPS three times, asking to check up on the boy.
At first, Mrs. Smith and Mr. Roland told officers that their 4-year-old son was staying with relatives.
When police discovered the burned child tucked away in a bedroom closet, both parents claimed that the pot was accidentally knocked over.
During questioning, however, the mother and father admitted to inadvertently injuring their son during an altercation and blamed the other for failing to get medical attention for him.
In the course of the 13 days the toddler had remained at the house, his parents reportedly treated his severe injuries with ointments and bandages, but the burns did not heal properly.
The 4-year-old has since been taken to Maricopa Medical Center Burn Unit, where he may now require a surgery.
‘Had that child received medical attention the same time that the father did – very likely not looking at as serious a condition as he is in now,’ Mesa Police Sgt. Tony Landato told the station KPHO.
The parents have reportedly had several run-ins with child services in Arizona and Wisconsin over the years. Their six children have been placed in the custody of CPS.

The mother, Mrs. Joscilin Smith, 28, allegedly threw a pot of boiling water at the boy’s father, Mr. Aaron Roland, during an argument. Some of the water splashed on the boy.
Medical documents say the boy suffered severe burns on his back, arm, shoulder and leg. They have been classified as the second-degree burns to 8 per cent of his body.
According to the local newsmen, the couple, who have seven children between ages one and 10, told police they didn’t take the child to the hospital because they were afraid they would be suspected of child abuse and lose their kids.
Mrs. Joscilin Smith has been charged with aggravated assault and three counts of child abuse, while Mr. Aaron Roland has been charged with a single count of child abuse.
According to police, the victim’s siblings reported a history of verbal and physical abuse.
The injured toddler’s maternal grandmother told police that she was on the phone with Mrs. Smith on July 27 when the bad parent of seven hurled a pot of boiling water at her husband during a fight.
Mr. Roland immediately applied some medical treatment for burns to his back and buttock, but the couple allegedly decided not to take their son to a hospital.
On August 9, 2013, Friday, police officers responded to the couple’s home in the 7300 block of East Naranja Avenue after getting a request for a welfare check from Child Protective Services.
Sammie-Jo Olson, who lives across the street from Smith and Roland, said that she had heard about the incident and called CPS three times, asking to check up on the boy.
At first, Mrs. Smith and Mr. Roland told officers that their 4-year-old son was staying with relatives.
When police discovered the burned child tucked away in a bedroom closet, both parents claimed that the pot was accidentally knocked over.
During questioning, however, the mother and father admitted to inadvertently injuring their son during an altercation and blamed the other for failing to get medical attention for him.
In the course of the 13 days the toddler had remained at the house, his parents reportedly treated his severe injuries with ointments and bandages, but the burns did not heal properly.
The 4-year-old has since been taken to Maricopa Medical Center Burn Unit, where he may now require a surgery.
‘Had that child received medical attention the same time that the father did – very likely not looking at as serious a condition as he is in now,’ Mesa Police Sgt. Tony Landato told the station KPHO.
The parents have reportedly had several run-ins with child services in Arizona and Wisconsin over the years. Their six children have been placed in the custody of CPS.